FTX Paid $700M to Politicians and Celebrities: Now They Want It Back

The FTX saga continues as its sister firm Alameda tries to reclaim $700 million from politicians and celebrities.

On behalf of Sam Bankman FTX asking for money back.
Created by Kornelija Poderskytฤ— from DailyCoin
  • FTX’s sister firm, Alameda Research, is seeking the return of $700 million paid to politicians and celebrities.
  • The funds were allegedly used to gain access to influential figures. 
  • Filings detail the trail of money from Alameda Research to two well-connected agents. 

The FTX trial saga continues to expose corruption at the highest levels. A recent filing claims that former owner Sam Bankman-Fried paid $700 million to gain access to influential celebrities and politicians. FTXโ€™s sister firm Alameda Research wants to get that money back. 

Sponsored

A Thursday, June 22, a court filing by Alameda Research details Sam Bankman-Fried dealings with two prominent agents with access to major figures in politics and show business. 

Dealings with Former Clinton Aide, with โ€˜Extensive Connectionsโ€™

The court filing deals with SBFโ€™s deal with K5 Global, an advisory firm founded by Michael Kives and Bryan Baum. It details a number of payments, amounting to $700 million, to K5 Global, founded by Michael Kives and Bryan Baum. 

Diagram detailing Alameda Research's payments to K5 Global
Source: Court filings

Kieves is a former Creative Artists Agency (CAA) agent and a former aide to Bill and Hillary Clinton. He is known for his extensive network of connections, including celebrities and politicians, which he leveraged in his work with K5 Global. 

The complaint alleges that Bankman-Fried, Kives, and Baum signed a term sheet in February 2022. This agreement stipulates that Bankman-Fried or a related entity would personally give each of Kives and Baum $125 million. Moreover, SBF also agreed to invest billions into K5 Global and affiliated entities over the next three years.

The complaint also alleges that by the end of September 2022, Alameda Research Ltd. had transferred another $200 million to K5 entities, bringing the total pre-petition transfers to Kives, Baum, and entities under their control to $700 million. 

Diagram detailing mount olympus transaction.
Source: Court filings.

Lawyerโ€™s Argument: SBF Treated FTX and Alameda as โ€˜Slush Fundsโ€™

The lawyers argue that these deals did not provide equivalent value to Alameda Research and that Kives and Baum knew that. They acted with โ€œdishonest mindsโ€ and knowingly assisted SBF in breaching his fiduciary duty to Alameda Research. 

โ€œBankman-Fried treated the legal entities that he controlled as a slush fund,โ€ Alameda lawyers claimed in the filings. His behavior, they added, showed a โ€œnear-total disregard for corporate formalities.โ€ 

The filing alleges that Kives and Baum knew or should have known that the deal did not provide reasonably equivalent value to Alameda Research. Moreover, they also should have known that SBF personally benefited from them. 

On the Flipside

  • Previous court filings alleged that Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX insiders took $3.2 billion from the firm. 
  • Court filings represent the opinion of one side in a lawsuit. They donโ€™t constitute official court decisions or proof of any wrongdoing. 

Why This Matters

The FTX case is a significant development for crypto traders. It highlights the potential risks associated with the industry’s business practices and underscores the need for transparency and accountability. 

Read more about SBFโ€™s alleged crimes 

Sam Bankman-Fried and Insiders Took $3.2B from FTX

Read more about SBF and his role in FTX: 

Sam Bankman-Fried: Crypto’s Fallen Hero?

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

Author
David Marsanic

David Marsanic is DailyCoinโ€™s journalist, focusing on Solana and crypto exchanges. David currently doesnโ€™t hold any crypto.

Read more