Cracks Down on Forked App Users

The decentralized social media platform seeks to confiscate users’ reward points as punishment for experimenting with other platforms.

A futuristic looking decective wearing blue bunny ears approaching the camera.
Created by Gabor Kovacs from DailyCoin
  • attempts to discourage users from trying cloned apps.
  • The social media platform has seen a decline in popularity.
  • Members of the crypto community view its penalization policy as overreach.

August 9 saw the Ethereum Layer-2 platform Base open its public mainnet. Just weeks later, Base has surpassed 950k total users at the time of writing, according to Dune. A significant aspect of Base’s initial success was attributed to SoFi app, which also enjoyed booming success during its release. 

In a reverse of trends, the app’s popularity has begun to wane over the past week. What’s more, it seems as though the devs are blaming copycats for the falloff. Discourages Clone Use

The app facilitates profile tokenization, enabling users to sell “keys”, formerly called “shares”, of themselves. The process allows key buyers access to direct private messaging to sellers. At the height of’s popularity, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire opined that a business-focused clone might snowball into something big.


In a now-deleted tweet posted on August 29, acknowledged that rival platforms hard forking their code will enter the picture. In an unexpected twist, has opted to penalize users who experiment with cloned platforms by confiscating their reward points.

The reward system was announced on August 14 to distribute 100 million tokens to beta users over six months. At this stage, the actual benefits of the reward points are unclear.

Points are collected off-chain during the beta period and will have a special purpose when the app enters official release status,”said

Since August 21,’s on-chain stats have shown a steep decline. The most recent data from Dune showed the number of transactions falling from an August 21 hourly peak of 28.9k to 2k at the time of writing. With that, it appears that the draconian penalization policy may be an attempt by devs to stem the decline.

Crypto Community Pushback

The crypto community gave a mixed response to’s penalization policy. 

On-chain Detective ZachXBT waded into the discussion by posting a meme that implied the penalization policy was akin to how a brutalist political regime might react. 

Crypto Engineer “K A L E O” pointed out that should fully use its first mover advantage and focus on building a quality product rather than threatening users. 

Threatening / penalizing users for trialing other platforms is completely against everything this industry stands for,” said K A L E O.   

On the Flipside

  • Hard forks and copycat clones are common practices in the cryptocurrency industry.
  • is in beta phase testing, and declining metrics may not represent post-official release activity.

Why This Matters‘s penalization policy is anti-competitive and inconsistent with cryptocurrency ideals. 

Read more on the growing concerns about’s decline here:

Base’s Loses Steam Amid Privacy and Legal Concerns

Discover Polygon’s play on futureproofing its protocol here: 

Polygon CEO Shares Vision For “Enshrined Restaking” in Multichain Future

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

Samuel Wan

Samuel Wan is a finance professional turned crypto journalist, known for his insightful reporting on market trends, regulatory changes, and technological developments within the digital asset industry. His ability to simplify complex concepts and report the facts has made him a trusted source in the crypto community. Beyond his writing, Samuel is an active mountain biker and gamer.