- The SEC and Ripple have locked horns, unveiling a fierce battle over crucial documents.
- Tensions have risen as both sides have accused each other of distorting facts.
- Ripple has responded to the SEC’s assertion that Ripple’s objections are “baseless.”
The ongoing legal battle between the SEC and Ripple Labs took another turn this week, with both sides firing off sharp retorts in a recent court filing. The dispute centers on the SEC’s request to access Ripple’s financial statements and contracts related to its XRP sales, a key element in the regulatory body’s claim that Ripple violated securities laws.
SEC & Ripple Clash Over Documents
The SEC seeks to compel Ripple to produce these documents, claiming they are crucial to their case. Ripple, however, argues the request is overly burdensome and irrelevant to the ongoing lawsuit. This disagreement has escalated further, with both sides accusing each other of misrepresenting facts in recent court filings.
The SEC filed a rebuttal to Ripple’s objections, dismissing their arguments as baseless. They claim Ripple has not demonstrated how producing the requested documents would be excessively burdensome. Additionally, the SEC contends Ripple has already produced similar documents in another legal case, making their current objection disingenuous.
Judge to Rule on “Misleading” Evidence
Ripple, in turn, fired back with a motion to file a sur-reply. They allege the SEC has made “significant factual mischaracterization” in their rebuttal, misrepresenting Ripple’s previous actions and the scope of the requested documents. Ripple insists these errors are critical for the court to make a fair ruling.
Sponsored
Further fueling the flames, Ripple accuses the SEC of mischaracterizing their involvement in a separate class-action lawsuit. In that case, they deny producing contracts beyond December 2020 and argue the SEC is seeking contracts beyond those directly related to XRP sales, which a judge previously ruled were not securities.
On the Flipside
- Ripple contends that the SEC’s request for financial statements and XRP sales-related contracts is not only burdensome but also irrelevant to the ongoing lawsuit.
- Ripple asserts that the SEC has mischaracterized their involvement in a separate class-action lawsuit, vehemently denying the production of contracts beyond December 2020 in that specific case.
Why This Matters
The court now holds the key, deciding whether to grant Ripple’s request to submit a sur-reply and ultimately determine the extent of financial records Ripple must disclose. This decision could have significant implications for both the specific case and the wider cryptocurrency regulation debate.
Sponsored
To learn more about the amicable settlement that closed Ripple’s $15 million XRP case, delve into the details here:
Ripple’s $15 Million XRP Case Closed in Amicable Settlement
Curious about why the SEC rejects Ripple’s claims as baseless? Uncover the intricacies by reading further:
“Ripple is Wrong”: SEC Rejects Ripple’s “Baseless” Claims
