- Ripple’s legal chief has leveled serious accusations against the SEC Chairman Gary Gensler.
- Gensler’s push for securities law has stirred controversy among industry leaders.
- Federal judges have openly criticized the SEC’s handling of high-profile lawsuits.
Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, has taken a bold stance on a public platform to level accusations against Gary Gensler, the Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging fraud and manipulation.
Ripple Fires Back at Gensler’s Aim to Regulate Cryptocurrency
Their vocal response was prompted by Gensler’s recent comments on Bloomberg, where he espoused the virtues of applying securities law as a safeguard against fraud and manipulation within the cryptocurrency sector.
Sponsored
Alderoty did not mince words, condemning Gensler for his blatant disregard for the judicial decisions Ripple has tirelessly contested. Ripple’s ongoing battle revolves around the quest for regulatory clarity within the United States.
Gensler, however, staunchly asserts that extending securities laws to the crypto realm is the path to safeguarding investors from potential malfeasance. Ripple and Coinbase executives have expressed their reservations regarding the regulatory vacuum, emphasizing that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies.
Federal Judges Slam SEC’s Claims as ‘Arbitrary and Capricious’
Federal judges have not been reticent in their criticisms of the SEC either. In the Grayscale lawsuit, the SEC’s claims were branded as “arbitrary and capricious.” In the Ripple lawsuit, Judge Netburn employed the term “hypocrisy” to encapsulate the SEC’s perceived position inconsistency.
Further scrutiny reveals that the SEC’s argument regarding the “question of law” requirement for interlocutory appeal has been met with skepticism, and their authority remains an issue yet to be fully addressed. Stuart Alderoty does not mince words when he characterizes the SEC’s interlocutory appeal filing as hypocritical, asserting that it lacks substantive impact.
On the Flipside
- The absence of clear regulations in the crypto sector also poses risks for investors, potentially leaving them without legal recourse in fraud cases.
- It’s worth noting that not all federal judges have been uniformly critical of the SEC. Some have supported the agency’s efforts to establish regulatory oversight in a rapidly evolving digital asset landscape.
- Stuart Alderoty’s characterization of the SEC’s interlocutory appeal filing as lacking substantive impact is a matter of perspective.
Why This Matters
Stuart Alderoty’s bold accusations against SEC Chair Gary Gensler underscore the intense legal battles within the crypto industry and spotlight the ongoing struggle for regulatory clarity in the United States.
To learn more about the potential impact of CBDCs on the global economy, read here:
Ripple Report Reveals 95% of World’s GDP Considers CBDCs
To stay updated on the latest developments in the SEC lawsuit involving CZ Binance and its US affiliate, click here:
CZ, Binance, and U.S. Affiliate File to Dismiss SEC Lawsuit
