OKX Delisting Compounds Privacy Token Liquidity Woes

Following OKX’s decision to delist Monero, Zcash, and Dash, privacy token liquidity sinks to a new all-time low.

A force coming out in waves from OKX.
Created by Kornelija Poderskytė from DailyCoin
  • Privacy token liquidity drops to a new all-time low
  • Kaiko attributes falling privacy token liquidity to exchange delistings
  • The future of privacy tokens is uncertain.

Financial regulators continue cracking down on cryptocurrency anonymity, putting pressure on privacy tokens. As a result, major exchanges are increasingly delisting or restricting trading for privacy tokens. In December, OKX compounded the issue by axing multiple privacy-focused tokens, including Monero, ZCash, and Dash, leading to record low privacy token liquidity.

Privacy Token Liquidity Dries Up

According to data from Kaiko, privacy token liquidity sunk to an all-time low of just $5 million, based on a 1% market depth measurement. Kaiko attributed the liquidity slump to OKX’s December delisting, which removed several privacy tokens from the platform’s offerings. 

Sponsored

Market depth is a measure of liquidity in an asset that shows how the price will be affected by a new order. In Kaiko’s case, it measures the total value of buy and sell orders outstanding on exchanges within a 1% deviation of the current price.

The same metric registered a $34 million 1% market depth in November 2021, when crypto markets were booming and less burdened by regulatory crackdowns. However, privacy token market depth has declined since then, with sharp drops coinciding with major bearish events such as the Terra crash in May 2022 and the FTX scandal in November 2022.

Privacy token liquidity and volume chart from Kaiko.
Privacy token liquidity chart from Kaiko.

OKX Delists Raft of Privacy Tokens

Late December 2023 saw OKX announce the removal of several tokens from its platform, including major privacy coins such as Monero (XMR), Zcash (ZEC), and Dash (DASH). While the exchange attributed the decision to user feedback and failure to adhere to guidelines, some believe that Financial Action Task Force (FATF) pressure was behind the delisting of the privacy tokens.

FAFT guidelines call for exchanges to combat money laundering and terrorist financing by sharing originator and beneficiary information on crypto transactions. The agency also labels privacy-centric cryptocurrencies that can obscure the flow of funds a “red flag” for authorities to watch out for.

On the Flipside

  • In June 2023, FATF warned that three-quarters of jurisdictions had failed to fully adopt its guidelines.
  • Lower liquidity leads to higher volatility and slippage, making trading more difficult.
  • It seems privacy cannot be reconciled with regulatory compliance, casting doubt on the case for privacy-focused tokens.

Why This Matters

The evaporating liquidity for leading privacy coins is the latest sign of the growing threat to their long-term viability. With exchanges and regulators continuing to crack down, the future for privacy tokens looks bleak.

Sponsored

Read about allegations of Ocean Mining being complicit in censoring Bitcoin transactions here:
Bitcoin Privacy at Risk: Ocean Mining Accused of Censorship

Find out more on Bitboy’s protest in support of the Bitcoin ETF here:
Bitboy “Not Leaving” SEC Offices Until Bitcoin ETF Approved

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

Author
Samuel Wan

Samuel Wan is a finance professional turned crypto journalist, known for his insightful reporting on market trends, regulatory changes, and technological developments within the digital asset industry. His ability to simplify complex concepts and report the facts has made him a trusted source in the crypto community. Beyond his writing, Samuel is an active mountain biker and gamer.