- Lawmakers have claimed that the SEC has bypassed proper procedures.
- Lawmakers have targeted a rule that required crypto custodians to record assets as liabilities.
- Key representatives have called the SEC’s rule unfair and have demanded more industry involvement.
A bipartisan effort in the U.S. Congress threatens to unravel a key accounting rule for cryptocurrency custody services. Lawmakers are taking aim at Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121 (SAB 121) issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), arguing it imposes undue burdens on financial institutions and stifles innovation in the digital asset space.
Lawmakers Challenge SEC’s Custody Rule
The crux of the issue lies in SAB 121’s requirement for companies holding customer crypto assets to record them as liabilities on their balance sheets. Critics, led by Senator Cynthia Lummis and Representatives Wiley Nickel and Mike Flood, argue this forces companies to set aside significant capital, hindering their ability to compete and grow.
Sponsored
Beyond the financial impact, the legislative challenge also hinges on the SEC’s rulemaking process. Lawmakers like Rep. Flood contend that the agency bypassed crucial regulatory steps, such as public consultation and coordination with other regulators.
This, they argue, constitutes an overreach that necessitates congressional intervention to ensure balanced oversight of the rapidly evolving crypto landscape.
The lawmakers’ actions highlight Congress’s regulatory check and balance role. By invoking the Congressional Review Act, they aim to repeal SAB 121, arguing that its lack of transparency and industry input undermines both regulatory clarity and the operational viability of crypto companies.
Will Crypto Get Caged?
The outcome of this legislative challenge can potentially set a significant precedent for future crypto regulations. It could determine the level of regulatory scrutiny, industry involvement in rulemaking, and, ultimately, the shape of the digital asset market itself.
The debate surrounding SAB 121 and the ensuing congressional challenge underscores the complex and often contentious relationship between regulatory bodies and the digital asset industry. As the situation unfolds, all eyes will be on the implications for regulatory practices, market stability, and the broader trajectory of cryptocurrency adoption.
On the Flipside
- Transparency on liabilities could boost investor confidence and attract institutional participation.
- While lawmakers tout their role as a check, some view their actions undermining the SEC’s authority and established rulemaking processes.
Why This Matters
This bipartisan congressional challenge could reshape the crypto market by impacting the regulatory landscape, industry participation in rulemaking, and the viability and growth of crypto businesses. The outcome sets a precedent for future regulations, potentially affecting market stability and the pace of cryptocurrency adoption.
Sponsored
This article discusses calls for Congressional intervention into the SEC’s handling of a crypto case:
Congress Advocated to Take Action on SEC and Gary Gensler
Want to know how Tether surpassed community expectations in Q4 2023? This article explores their future in crypto:
Tether Q4 Report: How It Surpassed Community Expectations
