XRP Live Wire

The globe’s largest meme coin and one of the most covered utility altcoins ended up in one basket, allowing investors outside of the cryptosphere to invest in these tokens. T. Rowe Price, an American digital asset manager holding nearly $2 trillion in assets under management (AUM), just dropped their multi token Crypto ETF (TKNZ) with an initial $15 million capital.

Multi-Asset ETF Drops With Surprising Roster

The leading asset in this basket is Bitcoin (BTC), consuming 41% of the total portfolio. Ethereum (ETH) takes up 18.4% of this cake, while Ripple’s native XRP coin got 9.37%. Interestingly, this carefully-picked ETF product also contains Dogecoin (DOGE), accounting for 1.28% of T. Rowe Price’s total crypto ETF share allocation.

It directly holds spot crypto via Anchorage Digital custody and is actively managed to outperform benchmarks by selecting 5-15 tokens based on research. This allocation to Hyperliquid’s native token underscores accelerating institutional interest in on-chain Perpetuals liquidity and altcoins, marking deeper crypto integration into traditional portfolios beyond 2024-era BTC/ETH focus.

T. Rowe’s Doors Left Half-Open For Other Alts

This one is strictly a Spot market exchange-traded fund (ETF), as stated in the SEC filings and fund documents: T. Rowe Price’s Crypto Basket ETF will not utilize leverage, derivatives, or similar arrangements. On the other hand, TKNZ is an actively-managed ETF product, meaning it’s flexible in roster - the $2 trillion asset manager could choose to switch up assets any time.

Some established alternative crypto currencies didn’t make the cut: Cardano (ADA), Shiba Inu (SHIB), Avalanche (AVAX), Litecoin (LTC), Chainlink (LINK), Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR) & plenty more, despite initial consideration. The American digital asset manager reserved the rights to cap the actively-managed basket up to 15 digital currencies, official documents say.

Following the news, XRP’s price continued to trade in consolidation mode at $1.08, while other major-caps slowly reclaimed their key support areas after the geopolitical storm settled in. BTC is trading at $64,000, while the apex altcoin ETH sits at $1,838, according to CoinGecko. The first trading days of this ETF will likely decide the near-term sentiment for assets included.

On The Flipside

Why This Matters

A Spot price-tracking ETF product including miscellaneous assets brings public traction to an innovative asset class to traders that would typically avoid it or be left out of the conversation.

Delve into DailyCoin’s popular crypto news today:Grayscale Rebrands Bitcoin Miners ETF Amid AI Computing ShiftBitcoin Capitulation Is Cooling, But $69K Remains Key

A crypto-focused wealth educator has spotlighted Evernorth, a company that has quietly accumulated more than 470 million XRP and is working toward a Nasdaq listing – potentially under the ticker “XRPN” via a SPAC merger.

Dr. Kamilah Stevenon frames the move as one of the clearest institutional “conviction signals” yet for XRP, arguing that this is not a trading play but a long-horizon balance-sheet strategy built in full public view.

A Corporate Vault Built Around One Coin

According to the YouTupe episode, Evernorth is structured as a “crypto treasury company” whose core purpose is to hold one asset – XRP – on its balance sheet on behalf of shareholders. Buying the stock, if and when it lists, would effectively be a proxy for owning a slice of that XRP pool.

Dr. Kamilah Stevenson likens the model to existing public companies that turned their balance sheets into single-asset vehicles for Bitcoin, with equity markets serving as an indirect way to gain exposure.

The distinction here is that Evernorth’s entire reason to exist is to warehouse XRP, taking coins off the open market and locking them into a long-term corporate vault.

The video also stresses that Evernorth’s backers are where the signal gets strongest: Ripple itself, SBI in Japan, Pantera, Kraken, and Arrington are cited as participating, with “more than a billion dollars in committed capital” around the structure.

All of this is appearing in public filings rather than behind closed doors.

Leverage Risks In Play & Retail Takeaways

Stevenson is careful to separate the corporate strategy from what retail investors should actually do.

A treasury vehicle like Evernorth can borrow against its holdings or issue stock and debt to buy more XRP, amplifying gains when prices rise but increasing vulnerability when the market turns. “A single person borrowing to pile everything into one volatile coin is playing a far more fragile game,” she warns.

Instead, the lesson for smaller investors is framed around structure, not leverage.

The video highlights using tax-advantaged vehicles such as a Roth IRA (via a crypto IRA platform) as a “personal vault” for XRP and other digital assets, emphasizing wealth preservation and tax planning over aggressive speculation. Corporate balance sheets can tolerate complex financial engineering; most individuals cannot.

Discover DailyCoin’s hottest crypto news today:Grayscale Rebrands Bitcoin Miners ETF Amid AI Computing ShiftBitcoin Capitulation Is Cooling, But $69K Remains Key

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) just announced their inaugural launch of equity conversions, securities lending & other tokenized infrastructure, enabling the production phase. Citadel’s securities are named to be the first ones rolled out. Luckily enough, the $69 billion assets under management (AUM) holding giant has strong ties with Ripple’s XRP Ledger.

DTCC’s First Conversion Unravels XRP Link

In a follow-up analysis by blockchain researcher SMQKE, one key fact is highlighted: Citadel's $500 million investment in Ripple alongside Fortress in October 2025, as shown in the attached timeline of Ripple's milestones including acquisitions & RLUSD integrations. DTCC’s traditional stock is worth $114T, leaving an open window for XRP to provide liquidity for quick settlement.

With the first DTCC trades now taking place, the immediate effect on the Real World Asset (RWA) market is yet to be determined. With Citadel’s $500 million investment in Ripple, the XRP-based On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) connection makes the most sense. However, SWIFT’s new multi-chain ledger allows a multitude of different chains that are also suitable for DTCC.

Moreover, Ripple’s multiple regulatory winnings and progress in institutional adoption positions XRP Ledger as one of the key contenders for tokenization. Ripple acquired GTreasury last year, garnering $13 trillion in processed volume without even touching crypto currencies. Once tokenized on-chain, traditional stock assets could fill the market capitalization with billions.

One More Thing Before The Floodgates Open

Ripple’s own RLUSD stablecoin is also becoming a prominent player in this picture. Breaking past $1.5 billion in market cap just a year since inception, this size could magnify once the Clarity Act clears. Doubtlessly, the digital asset-focused Clarity Act is the hottest legal topic among XRP Army members since the San Francisco-based fintech firm won against the SEC.

Recently, Ripple’s CTO & Emeritus David ‘JoelKatz’ Schwartz chimed in to remind the crypto fanbase about the broader implications of the infamous SEC. vs Ripple case. In a fiery response to a crypto enthusiast on X, David Schwartz insisted that all of the XRP activity was treated as a security, rather than singling out some ‘unregistered token sales’, citing former Chair Gensler.

The DTCC described their tokenization with Citadel as a “a notable milestone that marks the largest tokenization production initiative in breadth of use cases, asset classes and number of participants.” Now market participants are guessing how much of that $114 trillion tokenization pie an established altcoin like XRP can actually handle, having a track record of billions a day.

On The Flipside

Why This Matters

Aside from adoption, DTCC picking banks directly linked to Ripple’s tech stack alludes to the fact that the San Francisco-based tech giant is striving to grab a piece of the $114 trillion pie.

Delve into DailyCoin’s hottest crypto news right now:Stripe’s $53B PayPal Takeover Bid Could Crown a New Stablecoin KingStellar Grabs a Slice of $60B Pie: $2.50 Coming For XLM?

SWIFT’s launch of its blockchain-based shared ledger has sparked fresh debate in the XRP community. While the new infrastructure enables 24/7 coordination of tokenized deposits across banks, it still relies on traditional rails for final settlement — leaving a gap that many believe XRP was built to fill.

Avalon Ingram On Changing Customer Expectations

Avalon Ingram, SWIFT’s Digital Assets Business Lead for Asia Pacific, has repeatedly emphasized how customer demands are evolving. She noted that “customer expectations are changing, with cross-border payments increasingly expected to be 24/7 and real-time.”

This shift is central to SWIFT’s strategy. The new ledger aims to meet these demands by acting as an orchestration layer — coordinating payment instructions across institutions without moving the actual funds on-chain. While this improves visibility and reduces some friction, the final settlement of value still often occurs on legacy systems, which can take hours or even days.

The Settlement Gap XRP Was Designed To Solve..

This is precisely where Ripple’s On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) using XRP shines. XRP enables near-instant final settlement as a neutral bridge asset, eliminating the need for pre-funded nostro/vostro accounts. Banks can source liquidity on-demand instead of tying up capital across borders.

Ingram’s comments on rising expectations for speed and availability align closely with Ripple’s long-standing pitch: traditional messaging systems (like SWIFT) handle communication well, but they don’t solve the liquidity and settlement challenges that slow down real value transfer.

Why This Fundamentally Matters For XRP Adoption

Many of the banks involved in SWIFT’s early pilots already have connections or partnerships with Ripple. This suggests a hybrid future where SWIFT’s orchestration layer works alongside specialized settlement solutions like the XRP Ledger.

Avalon Ingram’s focus on meeting modern customer demands for speed and accessibility doesn’t undermine XRP — it actually validates the problem XRP was created to solve. As institutions push for true 24/7, real-time movement of value, the need for efficient bridge assets and instant settlement becomes more critical.

In a nutshell, SWIFT is actively modernizing the messaging and coordination layer. XRP surely remains positioned as the efficient settlement layer that can complete the picture.

Stay in the loop with DailyCoin’s top crypto scoops:Stripe’s $53B PayPal Takeover Bid Could Crown a New Stablecoin KingStellar Grabs a Slice of $60B Pie: $2.50 Coming For XLM?

XRP is laser-focused on one number right now: $1.12. The token has been dancing just below this level, and a decisive daily close above it could flip the short-term script from choppy consolidation to real upside momentum.

Fail here, and we’re staring at a retest of the $1.00 psychological floor.

XRP Whales Are Voting With Their Crypto Wallets

On-chain watcher Ali Martinez just dropped a key update: whales bought 70 million XRP over the past week. That’s serious quiet accumulation while price stays range-bound. Combined with shrinking exchange balances, it suggests big holders are positioning for a potential breakout rather than dumping at current levels.

Technical Picture: Inverse H&S Setup Brewing

Chart watchers are buzzing about an emerging inverse head-and-shoulders pattern, with $1.12 acting as the critical neckline. A clean break higher could target the $1.30 zone — a former support area that flipped into resistance. It’s not a sure thing, but the setup plus whale buying gives bulls real ammo.

Network Upgrade On The Horizon For XRP Army

The XRP Ledger is gearing up for the fixCleanup3_2_0 maintenance amendment. Validator support has already hit the required threshold, kicking off the final countdown. While it’s more housekeeping than a flashy new feature, it cleans up technical debt and adds another layer of reliability right as traders hunt for catalysts.

Policy & Adoption Winds Are Blowing The Lid

Banking groups are pushing back on stablecoin “yield” language in proposed rules, worried it could blur lines between platform rewards and issuer interest. That debate hits home for dollar-backed tokens used in real payments — and networks like XRPL that are built for regulated flows.

On the adoption side, an exchange launched an XRP-denominated rewards campaign tied to Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin, using weekly incentives to drive activity. Ripple’s docs have also resurfaced, spotlighting “SWIFT messaging interoperability” capabilities — a technical nod, not a formal partnership, but one that keeps the payments narrative alive.

Right now, $1.12 is the line in the sand. But the story is bigger than one number: crypto whale accumulation, a pending network cleanup & shifting stablecoin rules are all converging.

XRP’s price isn’t just about trading. It's sitting at the crossroads of technical setup and growing institutional relevance. The next clean move above or below this level could set the tone for the rest of the month.

Discover DailyCoin’s popular crypto scoops today:Stripe’s $53B PayPal Takeover Bid Could Crown a New Stablecoin KingStellar Grabs a Slice of $60B Pie: $2.50 Coming For XLM?

A crypto-focused YouTube show host who talks wealth is warning investors not to sleep on an upcoming infrastructure shift: November 14, 2024, when SWIFT tightens the rules on how cross-border payment messages are formatted under the ISO 20022 standard.

In a recent breakdown, Dr. Kamilah Stevenson links this plumbing-level change to the digital assets ecosystem, particularly coins marketed as “ISO 20022 compliant” such as XRP.

SWIFT Kills Off Unstructured Payment Messages

For decades, banks have used SWIFT’s legacy MT messages—a kind of digital telegram—to move money. These messages often pack names, cities, and countries into a single, unlabeled line that frequently needs human review. Stevenson describes them as “a cramped little blob of text… a computer can’t really read it reliably.”

ISO 20022 replaces that with XML-based “MX” messages built from labeled fields—name, street, town, country—making data machine-readable and easier to validate. On November 14, as part of a major SWIFT release, every cross-border payment will have to include an address that is either fully structured or at least hybrid structured.

The purely unstructured address option is being “decommissioned… turned off,” the host says. If a bank still sends an unstructured address after that date, “it gets rejected.” At minimum, town and country must sit in their own dedicated fields.

Pressure is already rising. From January 1 this year, SWIFT began charging fees to keep the old MT format flowing through its translation layer. “The old language is now actively more expensive to speak,” she notes, arguing that banks now face both a cost penalty and a hard cut-off.

What “ISO 20022 Compliant” Really Means For XRP

The YouTube video pushes back on one of crypto’s favorite narratives: that ISO 20022 somehow guarantees a price catalyst for specific tokens. XRP is highlighted as “one of those assets connected to ISO 20022 because it’s ISO 20022 compliant,” but Kamilah Stevenson is explicit about what that actually implies.

Compliance means a given ledger “can speak the same structured language” and therefore can plug more easily into upgraded payment messaging rails. It does not mean SWIFT or banks will route settlement through any particular coin, nor that a switch gets flipped on November 14 that suddenly funnels flows into XRP.

“This is the messaging and data standard layer,” the host stresses. “It is how the instructions are written. It is not the switch that hands settlement over to any one coin.”

Still, Kamilah Stevenson frames ISO 20022 as an “infrastructure story” that favors assets already aligned with how banks will exchange data going forward.

She also draws a parallel between banks preparing for the deadline and individual investors structuring their own holdings—describing her decision to hold a portion of XRP in a Roth IRA to manage future tax burdens.

Read DailyCoin's popular crypto currency news today:Stripe’s $53B PayPal Takeover Bid Could Crown a New Stablecoin KingStellar Grabs a Slice of $60B Pie: $2.50 Coming For XLM?

David Schwartz, also known as JoelKatz and longtime CTO of Ripple, is pushing back hard against what he calls an attempt to rewrite the history of the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit.

In a recent post, Schwartz argued that the SEC didn’t just target specific sales — it treated XRP itself as a security across the board.

The SEC’s Core Argument

According to Schwartz, the SEC’s complaint repeatedly referred to XRP as the security. Their press release stated that Ripple “sold XRP coins” without a registration statement. The agency also described Ripple executives Chris Larsen and Brad Garlinghouse as “security holders.”

The key point: The SEC applied a single Howey analysis to all Ripple’s sales and offers of XRP — including blind sales on exchanges. They rejected the idea that different types of sales needed separate legal scrutiny.

Gary Gensler’s Own Words

David ‘JoelKatz’ Schwartz pointed to public statements from then-SEC Chair Gary Gensler as the clearest evidence. In speeches and comments, Gensler and the Commission framed the case around XRP itself, not just institutional or direct sales.

This broad approach was central to the SEC’s strategy. It wasn’t a narrow claim about certain buyers — it was a blanket assertion that XRP transactions by Ripple violated securities laws.

Howey Test Back In Focus

The SEC’s case heavily relied on the Howey Test, the classic legal framework used to determine whether something qualifies as an investment contract (and thus a security). Under Howey, an asset is a security if there is an investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others.

The SEC argued that Ripple’s sales of XRP met all these prongs — treating the token itself as the security, not just the way it was sold. This single, sweeping Howey analysis was applied to Ripple’s entire distribution strategy, from institutional deals to open-market sales, which became a major point of contention throughout the litigation.

Why This Still Matters Now

The debate has resurfaced as people revisit the case outcome and ongoing discussions around crypto regulation. Schwartz’s post serves as a direct rebuttal to anyone trying to downplay the SEC’s original position or claim they were only going after specific distributions.

For XRP holders and the broader crypto community, David Schwartz’s reminder reinforces a key narrative: The SEC took an aggressive & expansive view of what constituted a security: one that went far beyond the court ruling. The fight over how the case is remembered continues.

Discover DailyCoin’s popular crypto news right now:Stellar Grabs a Slice of $60B Pie: $2.50 Coming For XLM?The Swift–XRP Tie: Leaked Slide Puts Ripple In The Middle

In a new breakdown of U.S. stablecoin policy, Dana Love, PhD dissects how the much‑touted Genius Act — signed on July 18, 2025 and billed by the president as a way to “cement the American dominance of global finance and crypto technology” — has, a year later, produced no final rules but a very clear hierarchy of winners.

Dana Love's central claim: regulators have quietly missed their own deadlines while fast‑tracking a small group of federally chartered crypto banks, reshaping the market before the rulebook even exists.

Rules Missing, Charters Flying Out The Door

The Genius Act ordered six federal bodies, including the OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA, Treasury, and FinCEN/OFAC, to stand up a full stablecoin regime by July 18, 2026. Instead, the analyst counts eight proposed rules and “not one” finalized.

The OCC’s flagship proposal alone asked for public input on more than 200 design questions just four and a half months before the statutory deadline.

On June 22, regulators effectively admitted they would miss the date by publishing three more proposed rules whose comment periods stretch beyond July 18. FinCEN’s own paperwork reportedly assumes finalization in 2027, conveniently matching a statutory backstop that activates the Act on January 18, 2027 “no matter what.”

In parallel, the OCC quietly amended its chartering regulation, clearing national trust banks to custody digital assets — and then, in about seven months, granted full or conditional charters to roughly 10 crypto firms, including Ripple, Circle, Coinbase, Paxos, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, Crypto.com, Stripe’s acquired unit, and Sony Bank.

“Delay is a moat for the chartered and a wall for everyone else,” the analyst argues, noting that the proposed federal path has a $5 million capital floor, no state has yet been certified for the state route, and foreign‑issuer rules are still in flux. Traditional banks have branded the structure a “Franken‑charter” and are weighing legal action, according to Dana Love.

Stablecoins Take The Field, Bitcoin Gets Sidelined

While bitcoin finally won formal “digital commodity” status from the SEC and CFTC and enjoys ETF access and institutional custody, it sits largely outside the payments architecture being built.

Then, Dana Love points out that the Genius framework, the new charters, and even a 17‑bank shared ledger launched via SWIFT all revolve around tokenized dollars, not BTC. June stablecoin transaction volume hit a record $1.79 trillion in a single month, with bitcoin relegated to “cargo” — an asset to be wrapped and custodied rather than spent.

By on‑chain volume, Circle’s USDC is the year’s clear leader, handling an estimated 70% of stablecoin payment flows in the first half of 2026 despite Tether’s larger supply. Tether’s flagship USDT sits at about $184 billion versus USDC’s $73 billion, yet much of that trades outside the emerging U.S. framework.

Tether’s compliant U.S. token, USAT, launched via Anchorage in January and has reached roughly $141 million — a fraction of newer rivals.

Ripple’s “Full Stack” Bet & The Stalled Clarity Act

Dana Love singles out Ripple as the most strategic mover in this regulatory vacuum. Its dollar token RLUSD launched under New York’s trust regime in late 2024, then moved under a conditional national trust charter in December 2025, placing reserves under both state and federal oversight.

By mid‑2026, RLUSD had grown to about $1.55 billion in supply, roughly ten times USAT, despite Tether’s decade‑long head start in stablecoins.

Ripple’s XRP token has been classified a digital commodity, and the firm has applied for a Federal Reserve master account — a direct connection to Fedwire that, if approved, would allow RLUSD reserves to sit at the Fed itself.

The analyst frames this as “license plus pipe” a combination no other crypto player currently has: the OCC charter as the license, the Fed account as the plumbing, and the XRP Ledger as the base infrastructure where fees are paid in XRP.

“The stablecoin is the product. The ledger is the moat. The token is the toll,” Dana Love, PhD says.

All of this unfolds as the broader market‑structure bill, the Clarity Act, stalls in the Senate. Despite strong bipartisan votes in the House and Senate Banking Committee, the measure faces fights over presidential crypto income disclosures, liability shields for software developers, and a hard ban on stablecoin yield that would hit platforms such as Coinbase.

With recent deaths, injuries, and thin margins complicating Senate math, the analyst now pegs the odds of Clarity passing before midterms at about 35%.

Why This Matters Crucially For Crypto Investors

The U.S. stablecoin market is already around $303 billion, with most activity still running on what the analyst calls the “honor system” — legacy disclosures and state rules rather than the promised federal regime.

In that gap, federal charters and access to Fed rails are emerging as the real moat. Large issuers with early charters and strong compliance stacks — notably Circle and Ripple — appear best positioned to capture regulated volume once the Genius Act finally turns on in 2027, while smaller players face rising capital and licensing barriers.

Dana Love's advise to investors: watch the charters, master‑account decisions, and any Treasury move to certify states. Those signals are likely to matter more for market share than the eventual wording of rules everyone is already learning to route around.

Delve into DailyCoin’s popular crypto news today:Japan’s Stablecoin Push: Lawson Tests JPYC, SBI Preps JPYSC YieldICE and OKX to Tokenize NYSE Stocks: Will Regulators Kill It?