SEC is Investigating BlockFi Regarding the Crypto Exchange’s High-Yield Accounts

The SEC seems to be concerned with BlockFi’s high interest rates for lending out staked digital tokens from clients who opt-in for that very purpose.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has focused its sights on another blockchain-based company – this time it’s BlockFi. The SEC seems to be concerned with BlockFi’s high interest rates for lending out staked digital tokens from clients who opt-in for that very purpose. 

The SEC is questioning if those BlockFi accounts might be securities, requiring registration with the agency to be eligible to operate. BlockFi promotes annual percentage yields up to 9.5 percent on its website, which is much higher than most traditional bank savings accounts that offer less than 0.5 percent. A few states, such as Texas and New Jersey have taken action against BlockFi for subpar customer protections and questionable marketing tactics. 

What’s ironic is that most crypto lenders and decentralized finance companies – as well as BlockFi — are able to provide retail investors such outstanding returns, because they charge institutional investors much higher fees to access crypto markets. The sky-high fees paid by big banking and financial fiefdoms actually trickle down to individual investors – benefiting the little guy for once. But why let those facts get in the way of a good SEC investigation. 

BlockFi is privately held and was most recently valued at $4 billion with more than a half million retail accounts on the books. It’s important to note that the SEC hasn’t accused BlockFi of any wrongdoing or criminal activity, and not all agency investigations lead to enforcement actions.

On The Flipside

  • The SEC is continuing to build a brand as a grade-A bully.
  • During the past year the SEC has gone after Tether, Coinbase, Ripple, Binance, and BlockFi.
  • At what point does regulatory oversight become abuse of power?

Why You Should Care?

This ongoing assault against crypto by the SEC has to stop. It consistently appears to be overstepping its statutory boundaries to harass and cajole crypto/blockchain organizations beyond its congressionally allowed remit. 

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

Tags
Author
Tor Constantino

Tor Constantino is a former journalist, consultant and current corporate comms executive with an MBA degree and 25+ years of experience - writing about cryptocurrencies and blockchain since 2017. His writing has appeared across the web on Entrepreneur, Forbes, Fortune, CEOWorld and Yahoo!. Tor's views are his own and do not reflect those of his current employer.